1. News & Issues

Discuss in my forum

Deborah White

Obama's Nixonian Traits: Beach Walking with Two Disliked Presidents

By , About.com GuideMay 31, 2010

Follow me on:

President Obama is a puzzling leader and a complicated man.

Sadly, his conflicted internal dramas are exacting a toll on his presidency and, as shown, for instance, in the ludicrously protracted health care reform debate and in his passive-aggressive resistance to responding to the Gulf Coast's historic environmental disaster, are causing damage to our country.

While I reject every last one of the unhinged comparisons of Barack Obama to the nutcases, villains, and assorted psychopaths of history, I sheepishly admit to detecting certain unsettling Nixonian traits in our 44th president.

I fear that, without major changes, President Obama could be forced out of office, one way or another.

Beach Walking with the 37th and 44th Presidents
Mr. Obama's public foray on a tarred Louisiana beach last week felt eerily familiar: a President silently walking a beach, overdressed in dark slacks and crisp, long-sleeved dress shirt while those around him were attired in casual khakis, and polo, button-down, and short-sleeved I'm-one-of-you shirts.

The President looked solemnly uncomfortable milling and crouching on a sandy beach, and awkward chatting with his few companions. During the subsequent 15-minute news conference, Mr. Obama dispassionately read from prepared notes that detailed technical concerns. The President said most of the right words that needed to be said, but in an unengaged monotone that evoked no emotion, no ownership of the sentiments. He took no questions.

Watching the spectacle unfold, I was thunderstruck by two chilling observations:

  • This is decidedly not the same aspirational person who electrified the nation on July 27, 2004 at the Democratic convention with an energetically inspiring speech in which he proclaimed:
    "Do we participate in a politics of cynicism or do we participate in a politics of hope? ...

    "I'm not talking about blind optimism here - the almost willful ignorance that thinks unemployment will go away if we just don't think about it, or the health care crisis will solve itself if we just ignore it. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about something more substantial."

    You can view Obama's landmark 2004 speech HERE on YouTube. (Text is at Obama's Inspiring 2004 Democratic Convention Speech.)

    Either Barack Obama has drastically altered in six years, or we never really knew the man we saw that fateful summer evening. Six years ago, Obama hungered to lead our nation. Today, he seems to have lost interest. Like post-Watergate Nixon, Obama looks defeated and deflated compared his 2004 ebullience.

  • On the scarred Gulf Coast beach, Obama's neat business attire, rigidly-controlled body language, and emotional distance from others were jarringly reminiscent of Richard Nixon's stiff seaside strolls wearing business dress. Reports Trivia-Library.com:
    "Nixon always appeared to be more comfortable in his 3-button business suits than in casual wear. While relaxing in the sun at Key Biscayne or San Clemente, he was often dressed primly in a sports jacket. During his solitary walks along the beach, he generally wore his black dress shoes."

Certainly, Barack Obama is not freighted with most of Richard Nixon's terrible flaws. In Obama, there's nary a shred of Nixon's legendary paranoia. As Michigan State University Professor John Coogan recently wrote, tongue-in-cheek, to a student:

"I trust Mr. Duffy will keep the MSU community informed as the president continues to adopt 'Tricky Dick's' policies. Perhaps 'Tricky Barack' can initiate a secret bombing of Laos and an invasion of Cambodia? Reactivation of the draft? An 'enemies list?'

"An FBI director 'twist(ing) slowly, slowly, in the wind'? National guardsmen gunning down students at Kent State? Snipers in Beaumont Tower, armored personnel carriers blocking Abbot Entrance, and a student demonstrator kicking the president of MSU in the crotch? Ah, the good old Nixon days!"

But since Obama's sullen four-hour visit to Louisiana last Friday, comparisons between our 44th and 37th Presidents haunt me, including:

Professor Coogan half-facetiously put forth a handful of comparisons between Obama and Nixon, but most could be applied to dozens of U.S. presidents, including:

  • "Double standards for high officials (neither Nixon nor Treasury Secretary Geitner paid their full income tax)"
  • "Inoperative promises ("I am not a crook"/"I will close Guantanamo within a year")"
  • "Plentiful rhetoric about protecting the environment accompanied by plentiful off-shore drilling"
  • "Public presidential denunciations of the U.S. Supreme Court"

It Didn't End Well for Nixon
Here's my point: it didn't end well for Richard Nixon... in large part, I've always believed, because he was so thoroughly disliked on Capitol Hill and detested by the American public. Other presidents have committed some mighty unconscionable or stupid acts, and they weren't hounded from office.

President Nixon, was uniquely hated, though, or at least, uniquely until now, with the vociferous intensity of President Obama's opponents approaching Nixon-era levels. Put simply, a whole lot of Americans, particularly conservatives Americans, really, really don't like Barack Obama and his methods of operation.

My fear for President Obama, should he choose to stick with his intransparent, emotionally tepid, hyper-political way of conducting the nation's business is that:

  • First, that President Obama's public approval ratings will continue to drop. Rasmussen reports his May 31, 2010 "strong" approval to be merely 27%, with 40% of the nation "strongly disapproving".

  • Second, that Republicans will win control of Congress in the 2010 mid-term elections, and hence, win the power of the Congressional subpoena.

  • Third, that Congress, goaded by Americans livid over the flagging middle-class economy, ongoing endless wars, horribly botched oil spill, favors for corporate backers, or any number of issues... and egged on by Tea Party types who simply detest Mr. Obama... will hound him from office. Or worse...

I say all this to fervently urge the Obama White House toward more transparency. Toward more connection with the desires of the American people. Toward less reliance on political hacks to hone policy and policy messaging. Toward more courage, boldness and forthrightness, and less Nixonian-style "cynical political maneuvrings."

It didn't end well for Richard Nixon. I, and most Democrats, desperately want it to end well for Barack Obama. But our 44th president needs to realize that time and patience are running dangerously short.

(Photo #1 taken on Jan 13, 1971 of President and Mrs. Nixon walking the beach in San Clemente, CA: National Archives/Getty Images. Photos #2 and #3 taken on May 28, 2010: Win McNamee/Getty Images.)

Comments

May 31, 2010 at 2:55 pm
(1) giantslor :

I’m not going to waste my time correcting the many assertions you make. Suffice to say that you’re totally wrong on most points and way off base overall. I think you’ve been watching too much FOX Noise and/or reading too many right-wing blogs or listening to too much right-wing talk radio. It’s absolutely ludicrous that you think Obama is harming our country. He’s changing it for the better, it’s his opponents who are harming it. Just as absurd is your belief that Obama will be forced from office. His approval ratings are much higher than other presidents at this point in their presidency, and Obama’s ratings are holding steady.

In conclusion, it’s not Obama. It’s you.

May 31, 2010 at 5:53 pm
(2) Joe Reeser :

And empty suit was elected. It’s still empty.

May 31, 2010 at 7:53 pm
(3) John Ballard :

giantslor, I don’t know what planet you are from but your remarks are seriously off base. You may not have noticed but the site is called “Deborah’s US Liberal Politics Blog.”
Fox, right-wing blogs and shock-jock radio are not liberal and Deborah’s arguments are nowhere close to theirs.

Dedicated, informed liberal/progressive supporters have been dismayed at what seems to be a betrayal of baseline values by the president and have said so quite often, just as Deborah has done here.

I am a hidebound Obama supporter myself and do not always agree with either Deborah or the rest of my peers, but your comments reflect an embarrassing depth of ignorance about politics left, right and center. Before posting again, here or elsewhere, I recommend you do more homework.

June 1, 2010 at 1:37 am
(4) usliberals :

Thank you, John. I strive to be honest here, and not hide behind rote partisanship. I am a liberal, but that doesn’t mean that I fully support all liberal leaders or their stances.

In this case, I truly hope to see the President make a course correction. He’s a talented politician… albeit, inexperienced and perhaps not as temperamentally suited to the White House as, say, Bill Clinton.

June 1, 2010 at 11:03 am
(5) John Ballard :

I can’t argue. Before Obama got the nominatio I was a Hillary Clinton supporter and said so. Beteen the two I saw the race as a cocker spaniel againsgt a rotweiller, and my money was on the roweiller, simply because all else notwithstanding the presidedntg must be a ruthless politician firfst and all else second. All the good intentkilons in the world have no value if they cannot be put into full force.

In the case of HCR something is better than nothing, and from the current two high-profile stories with BP and Israel I do not expect any dramnatic outcomes that make him into a cowboy. As long as he’s the president we have to tqke what we can get. When I think of the alternative we were offered it makes my blood run cold.

June 1, 2010 at 4:54 pm
(6) RealTime53 :

Hi Deborah –

Two large black helicopters flew over the apartment building on Thursday. I presume that one of them was Marine One. This was his first time home since July. He didn’t stay long. Friday, he flew down to the Gulf and back. On Monday, thunderstaorms cancelled his Memorial Day services at the Abraham Lincoln National Cemetary. I wonder if he thanked G_d for the respite.

The guy is bone tired. Much of the testiness, the brittleness, and the distance might be attributed to that simple fact. FWIW.

June 1, 2010 at 5:29 pm
(7) usliberals :

RealTime, I’m sure you’re correct, and I really feel for Obama and his family.

But I’m also not sure that that’s sufficient enough fortitude by a sitting U.S. President. Things can get much tougher than this.

Mind you, I’m one of the very few liberals who doesn’t despise Richard Nixon. I think he was a brilliant leader in many respects, but quite flawed, too. (I practically live in the shadow of the Nixon Library. Drove by it twice today while running errands.)

I distinctly remember Nixon’s beach walks, as my parents had a small beach house in San Clemente then.

June 2, 2010 at 1:02 pm
(8) Andrea Sitler PhD :

It was a sad, sad day for America when Obama was awarded the title of US President. That day marked the beginning of the end of this nation as we know it. All we can do is hold on tight and hope to GOD things can be restored to “normal” once he is booted.

As for Nixon, my late husband was a strong supporter of him. He saw good in the man where few did. To compare this facade of a president to that man is an insult to Nixon.

Hopefully the Republicans will take back control this year and they boot this useless and harmful person out of office along with his VP. That would at least give the US a fighting change once again.

June 6, 2010 at 6:36 am
(9) Evil Progressives :

Interesting article. It’s wildly hilarious to me to read to the responses of all these Liberals, Progressives, Socialists and Communists (They all kinda inter-mingle with each other). I myself am my own man and do not label myself in some sort of moronic party. I simply look at the candidates and their previous voting records from past offices held and decide for myself what is best for my family.

I do think Obama has a bigger agenda and these annoying things like the gulf oil spill are getting in his way. He wants to get with his pal Maurice Strong and get on with the “AGENDA.”

Bush grew govt. and had his faults. He was in the tank with corporate America. Obama is in bed with the global elitists and the Union Leaders. It’s six of one and half a dozen of the other. Catch my drift. They are all in it for their agenda. I want my country back. Anyways……….

All Progressive Presidents are to be limited to Six Months in Office at which time he,she,it will be allowed to continus in office ONLY if ALL of the following questions will be answered in the NEGATIVE >>
> Have you endorsed or approved Socialist Statutes
> Have you Engaged in Criminal Obscurity (cover up)
> Have you demonstrated wayyyy below average IQ
> Do you know that Crude Oil is No More Than a Hole in the Ground
> Did your Mother Birth You outside of the United States
> Do you think that Non-Revenue Producing Government Jobs are better for the Economy than Private Industry Jobs
> Did you Take Over any Major US Industries lately
> Is your WH Staff overflowing with Terrorist sympathizers

June 6, 2010 at 6:42 am
(10) Evil Progressives :

Being as OBAMINISKI answered YES to ALL of these questions, his trip to the unemployment line is WAY overdue.

I agree with you PHD. He does need to get the hell out of the White House but is there a candidate from either side that has the balls to stand up to their party and finally do the right thing? God help us all if we have to endure another 4 years of the Progessive agenda. America will be no more!

June 19, 2010 at 3:08 am
(11) Riley :

We tried to tell you Obama wasn’t presidential material, but you wouldn’t put down the cool-aid.

Leave a Comment


Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>
Related Searches obama presidents

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved.

A part of The New York Times Company.